PDA

View Full Version : Distance Limitations by Cable Type


George Urchuk
August 16th, 2004, 12:59 PM
Hello,



I'm a Project Manager for a small process control team. We're currently working with a customer who is in the design stage for a mine that will use exclusively Foundation Fieldbus instruments and valves. Our customer is responsible for the segment design and has a question about different cable types and their effects on distance limitations.



The question relates specifically to Type A and Type B cables and the guidelines provided in table 6.1.1 of the Foundation Fieldbus Wiring and Installation Guide.



Type A is single twisted pair with shield.



Type B is multiple twisted pair with shield.



Our customer is looking at the problem from a 'first principles' perspective and is trying to understand why, if you follow the table, going from 1 pair (type A) to 2 pair (type B) will drop your distance allowance from 1900 to 1200 while if you go from 2 pair to 32 pair (I'm using 32 pair as an example since the table does not list an upper limit for the number of pairs.) there is no change in the distance limit.



My assumption is that this is be cause type A can be considered as 'without interference' while type B, be it 2, 4 or 128 pairs is considered to be 'with interference' and the number of pairs does not affect the amount of interference to a significant degree. However, I'm trained as a mechanical engineer so my grasp of electrical signals has never really progressed beyond thinking of them as water in a pipe and I can't provide a first principles answer.



As a result, I have two questions:

1) Is there any Foundation Fieldbus documentation available that approaches the above from a first principles or similar perspective?



2) Is my assumption that the number or pairs in a Type B cable is not significant beyond having 2 or more instead of one pair (Type A) correct?



Thank-you for any help that can be provided,



George Urchuk,

NORPAC Controls

Mike ONeill
August 20th, 2004, 09:15 AM
The first comment is that the distance limitations stipulated in IEC61158-2 are all very conservative (we have successfully trialled a single-twisted pair Type A cable up to 4km).
The Ohm's Law limit will be reached before interference causes communications dropout.

jberge
August 29th, 2004, 09:19 PM
The reduction in length from type A to B is not due to multiple pairs but due to the smaller cross-section of the cable. I.e. it is simply Ohm's law.

For more details, take a look at chapter 3 of the book "Fieldbuses for Process Control: Engineering, Operation, and Maintenance" (buy online in hardcopy or download immediately in softcopy):
http://www.isa.org/fieldbuses